Fedora packaging: unison?

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 11:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > What was the initial reason for the 2.18 / 2.27 packaging
> > split? Is there any reason to continue to package multiple releases?
> > Should we just go back to having a single, 2.32-versioned 'unison'
> > package, or should we bump unison227 to be 2.32, or add a unison232
> > package?
> 
> My memory[1] scares me sometimes.
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg01229.html

Thanks, but afaics that thread doesn't really answer any of my
questions, it's just a bunch of yum technicalities about how the
implementation of having two packages actually works. What I'm
interested in is what was the original reason for having two branches
packaged, and do we still need to do it (or even have 3).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net