Fedora packaging: unison?

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:51:02 -0500, Michael wrote:

> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > What was the initial reason for the 2.18 / 2.27 packaging
> > split? Is there any reason to continue to package multiple releases?
> > Should we just go back to having a single, 2.32-versioned 'unison'
> > package, or should we bump unison227 to be 2.32, or add a unison232
> > package?
> 
> My memory[1] scares me sometimes.
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg01229.html

My memory adds that it has been discussed somewhere else, perhaps on
EPEL's list. The multiple packages were needed for compatibility.