[HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Fri Jul 23 13:28:24 UTC 2010
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:25:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 22.07.10 17:51, Horst H. von Brand (vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl) wrote:
>
> > > Kay and I have discussed this now. We agreed to fold systemd-install
> > > into systemctl entirely, and replace --realize by --now. Also, we'll
> > > drop some of the options --realize had, and always imply that the init
> > > system configuration shall be reloaded after all changes took
> > > place. This basically means that this
> > > is what will be done in %post in the general case:
> > >
> > > if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
> > > systemctl enable foo.service
> > > else
> > > systemctl daemon-reload
> >
> > Huh? One you have to tell about the affected service, the other not?
>
> Yes, because we reload init system configuration globally, not
> partially. This otherwise creates all kind of messes with problems where
> configuration changes might be half loaded and half not loaded.
>
> And the enable command already implicitly reloads the init system config
> to make sure the symlinks created are taken into account by the init
> system. When we upgrade packages we don't change anything howevber, and
> hence do only the init system reload.
>
Do you really mean this, then? ::
%post
if [ $1 -gt 1 ] ; then
systemctl enable foo.service
elif [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
systemctl daemon-reload
fi
(in %post and %pre, there are two packages installed when doing an upgrade.
Thus, the value of $1 will be 2 for an upgrade and 1 for an install).
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100723/8305e29b/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list