-upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts
Chen Lei
supercyper1 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 2 13:13:02 UTC 2010
Fedora have upstart as the /sbin/init daemon for a long time, but we
still use the old 'SysVinit' scripts from /etc/rc.d/init.d and fedora
packaging guideline have nothing about upstart.
Is it right for the maintainer to provide two separate subpackages,
one with the tranditional rc.d contents and one with an upstart
scripts and make the -upstart subpackage have a higher priority over
sysinit subpackage?
yum list \*-upstart
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
clamav-scanner-upstart.noarch 0.96-1403.fc14 @rawhide
Available Packages
clamav-milter-upstart.noarch 0.96-1403.fc14 rawhide
dhcp-forwarder-upstart.noarch 0.8-1300.fc13 rawhide
ip-sentinel-upstart.noarch 0.12-1300.fc13 rawhide
milter-greylist-upstart.noarch 4.2.4-1400.fc14 rawhide
tor-upstart.noarch 0.2.1.25-1400.fc14 rawhide
Regards,
Chen Lei
More information about the devel
mailing list