Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[Matt McCutchen]

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:41 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:25:01PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> > > yum.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/yum.bash
> > > yum.noarch: E: non-executable-script 
> > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/repos.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
> 
> > Which of those messages do you consider noise and why?  Most of them
> > look valid to me, though they are indeed nits.
> 
> Bash completion files are imho either always or never config files. So
> it is either an error that needs to be fixed or not worth a warning.

The right thing to do is to file a bug against bash-completion to get
that decision made and then implement it, either by marking the file as
config or moving /etc/bash_completion.d to /usr/share.  The warning is
not wrong.

-- 
Matt