Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings package maintainers,
> > >
> > > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > > packages?  This includes results of rpmlint [1],
> > 
> > Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its 
> > results are mostly noise.
> 
> Which packages do you maintain where the output has become unmanageable?

One thing I'd dearly like to see suppressed in most cases is the spell
checking. Most package descriptions need to use jargon which spell
checkers just don't recognize. I just ran some random rpmlints to check
how it's behaving these days, and here's my collection of 'spelling
error' warnings:

libdrm
sK
gpsd
pre

aside from this most of the output I get is pretty sane, though.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net