Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 06/02/2010 07:25 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Well, then lets begin:
>>
>> # rpmlint yum
>> yum.noarch: W: self-obsoletion yum-allow-downgrade<  1.1.20-0 obsoletes
>> yum-allow-downgrade
> [...]
>> yum.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/yum.bash
>> yum.noarch: E: non-executable-script
>> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/repos.py 0644L /usr/bin/python
 >
> [...]
>> Or ...
>> # rpmlint binutils
>> binutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US addr ->  add,
>> adder, adds
>> binutils.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
>> /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
>> binutils.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
>> /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13.so _exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
>> binutils.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
>> /usr/lib64/libopcodes-2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13.so /lib64/libz.so.1
>> binutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ld.bfd
>> binutils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ld.gold
>> binutils.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
>> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
>
> Which of those messages do you consider noise and why?
All of them.

Ralf