Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) forum at
Fri Jun 4 11:55:48 UTC 2010

  30.05.2010 21:19, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ?????:
> 21.05.2010 20:58, Panu Matilainen ?????:
>> On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
>>>> I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell
>>>> script.
>>>> Is there some variant of %include or similar?
>>> AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once for
>>> the specfile itself and once for the .macros file:
>> And neither of you actually thought to try whether %include works? :D
>> Hint: it does, in spec files.
>>   	- Panu -
> Thanks for the answers.
> Panu, you are sure? I try, and rpmbuild encountered error - 
Sorry for the answer to themselves.
Now, when bug fixed and rpm hit rawhide I can continue test it 
suggestion. And it does not work on strange manner - it is not produce 
any error, but also does nothing!
So, in minimal spec file was attached in the bug I have now in %prep:
%include %{SOURCE0}
exit 102

And at build time no TEST appeared:
$ LANG=C rpmbuild -ba test.spec
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pasha/SOFT/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ exit 102
error: Bad exit status from 
/home/pasha/SOFT/rpmbuild/BUILD/_tmp/rpm-tmp.ECc7qg (%prep)
     Bad exit status from 
/home/pasha/SOFT/rpmbuild/BUILD/_tmp/rpm-tmp.ECc7qg (%prep)

Please, can you more describe how it should work? What is prerequisites? 
May be link on detailed explanation?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the devel mailing list