pidgin obsoleting itself
mschwendt at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 10:19:50 UTC 2010
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:06:48 +0400, Peter wrote:
> 2010/6/9 Chen Lei:
> > But in this case, the obsoletes seems excessive, since
> > pidgin-evolution already depends on pidgin. If pidgin-evolution don't
> > depend on pidgin, the obsoletes is a must, without it pidgin will be
> > replaced by pidgin-evolution.
> If it pidgin-evolution was previously in main package, then this
> obsoletes is required. W/o this requires users may suffer from missing
> functionality after upgrade.
> * We need to split off p.-e, from pidgin
> * We need to install both of them while upgrading (Obsoletes in
> pidgin-evo) in order not to loose functionality.
> * We need to not erase main pidgin (Obsoletes in pidgin)
I wonder who's spreading theories like that? It's not the first time
this has come up in the past weeks. Most recently affected was nagios.
You _cannot_ add _optional_ packages to a user's installation _without_
proper dependencies somewhere else. Attempts at trying to do that with
Obsoletes are invasive and prone to getting it completely wrong.
More information about the devel