init script behaviour
cdahlin at redhat.com
Tue Jun 15 18:05:18 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:30:05PM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 03:08 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Thoughts?
> Well, I'd say it depends on how we define the "start" part. "fire and
> forget", "start and make sure it was started" or "start and make sure
> it is running".
I'd say fire and forget or something close for most sysv initscripts. If
you want to do better you need a modern tool like systemd/upstart/etc.
Trying to do it better in bash just makes for piles of ugly, and the
weird failure modes and corner cases will usually end up being worse
than the problem.
More information about the devel