Evolution update in F13

Adam Miller maxamillion at fedoraproject.org
Sat Jun 26 05:33:52 UTC 2010

Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?

Just a thought.

-AdamM (From Android)

On Jun 25, 2010 6:27 PM, "Jesse Keating" <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:

Hash: SHA1

Can anybody tell me what went wrong with this update?  It was submitted
at 15:09 on 06-23, then made it into testing at 16:19 on 06-24 and was
submitted for stable two hours later.  Between that submission and the
push to stable (push to stable happened at 18:09 on 06-25) numerous
negative karma came in due to broken deps.  The update went out anyway,
and now we have a mess of broken updates on a critical path package, and
have to scramble to fix it with more updates, on a Friday.

Can anybody help me understand the scenario here?  Should we start
filtering out push requests that have more than -2 karma?

- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

devel mailing list
devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100626/48c5008e/attachment.html 

More information about the devel mailing list