libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com
Wed Jun 30 08:23:20 UTC 2010


On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:

> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes <richmattes at gmail.com>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> > Rawhide [1].  I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
> > obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
> > Unfortunately, when it pulls in dependencies for my other BuildRequires,
> > it's trying to pull in libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo, and I get a conflict
> > since they both provide libjpeg.so.62.0.0
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is that one of the packages I'm requiring
> > has an explicit dep on libjpeg (I'm about to investigate which).  For
> > the time being, is there any to work around this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
> >
> > --
> 
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607554

Why doesn't  libjpeg-turbo  contain the proper Obsoletes for libjpeg?

Only libjpeg-turbo-devel does it correctly for libjpeg-devel and
libjpeg-static.

That's only half of the show. libjpeg-turbo is meant to replace libjpeg,
so it should obsolete it. And if it also added the "Provides", there
would be no need to rebuild dependencies, but considering that this is
Rawhide, okay if it doesn't add the "Provides".


More information about the devel mailing list