Bodhi 0.7.5 release

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at
Wed Jun 30 19:37:11 UTC 2010

Hash: SHA1

On 06/30/2010 03:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Will Woods <wwoods at> writes:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yes I can.  I have two critpath packages that are in testing with
>>> security bugs, both pretty small and easy to test, and both still have
>>> karma zero.  That seems to me to be adequate proof that there's not the
>>> manpower out there to do this.
>> Have you actually asked anyone to test it? Or even considered
>> *mentioning the names of the packages* so maybe someone here could help?
> I mentioned libtiff in my first comment in this thread.  The other one
> is libpng.  But in any case, are maintainers supposed to have to scare
> up testers on their own?  Especially for packages that are supposed to
> be so central as to be critpath?  If there aren't testers coming out of
> the woodwork, this scheme is doomed to failure.
> 			regards, tom lane

A suggestion: when critical path updates hit updates-testing, a
notification should go to both devel at and
qa at to encourage testing.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -


More information about the devel mailing list