Bodhi 0.7.5 release

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/30/2010 03:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Will Woods <wwoods at redhat.com> writes:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yes I can.  I have two critpath packages that are in testing with
>>> security bugs, both pretty small and easy to test, and both still have
>>> karma zero.  That seems to me to be adequate proof that there's not the
>>> manpower out there to do this.
> 
>> Have you actually asked anyone to test it? Or even considered
>> *mentioning the names of the packages* so maybe someone here could help?
> 
> I mentioned libtiff in my first comment in this thread.  The other one
> is libpng.  But in any case, are maintainers supposed to have to scare
> up testers on their own?  Especially for packages that are supposed to
> be so central as to be critpath?  If there aren't testers coming out of
> the woodwork, this scheme is doomed to failure.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane


A suggestion: when critical path updates hit updates-testing, a
notification should go to both devel at lists.fedoraproject.org and
qa at lists.fedoraproject.org to encourage testing.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwrnOcACgkQeiVVYja6o6N2/ACgsLvwWnvsy4kYnCytqrJ7C74g
mIsAn1Ki153jDL5UmY+adobGRxr+zdMu
=0KQL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----