Bodhi 0.7.5 release
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Wed Jun 30 19:47:29 UTC 2010
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
> Will Woods <wwoods at redhat.com> writes:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yes I can. I have two critpath packages that are in testing with
>>> security bugs, both pretty small and easy to test, and both still have
>>> karma zero. That seems to me to be adequate proof that there's not the
>>> manpower out there to do this.
>> Have you actually asked anyone to test it? Or even considered
>> *mentioning the names of the packages* so maybe someone here could help?
> I mentioned libtiff in my first comment in this thread. The other one
> is libpng. But in any case, are maintainers supposed to have to scare
> up testers on their own? Especially for packages that are supposed to
> be so central as to be critpath? If there aren't testers coming out of
> the woodwork, this scheme is doomed to failure.
I for one hope its effective. The recent issues with the evolution
show that its needed! The fact is that people miss things or upstream
will change things they should in a stable release that isn't
expected. Life happens. Worse case if its not is a revert of the bodhi
code that enabled it if it doesn't work.
More information about the devel