FESCo wants a more sane updates policy (feedback requested)

[drago01]

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> Mail Lists wrote:
>>   Kernel should follow mainline stable - as reasonably soon after
>> release and our testing as possible.
>>
>>   Core daemons - ditto.
>
> But that's quite different from what that proposed policy mandates.

No it isn't ... Jon added the "enable hardware enablement" bit after
he agreed that kernel rebases make sense.