FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:45:12 +0100
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:17:43 -0800, Adam wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 20:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > > Three times "Could". Let's talk about it when you know something
> > > definite, please, but before it will become another hurdle.
> > 
> > That's ironic - given that that's exactly what the people defending
> > this proposal wanted to do, while it's someone who's opposed to the
> > proposal who decided to start a premature argument about it.
> 
> Then let's see this thread as the updates-testing push of a proposal
> FESCo might have given its blessing to, if this thread had not been
> started.

Except it's more like a scratch build that someone built quickly, then
decided that a more detailed approach was needed, so they didn't even
submit an update. ;) 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100301/8a1fed8c/attachment.bin