FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 00:58 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> 1. upgrades which disrupt, regress or break things. Those can only be pushed 
> to Rawhide, if at all. (Sometimes it might be better to not push a change 
> even to Rawhide.)
> 2. upgrades which do none of the above. Those are what adds value to stable 
> releases and pushing those is a good thing. It provides value which no other 
> major distribution is providing, at least not those with numbered releases. 

And without using some sort of repository for users to test things and
provide feedback, how do you propose we distinguish between the two sets
of updates there?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100301/fa3b06aa/attachment.bin