FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Orion Poplawski]

On 3/1/2010 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I will note again that 0 karma doesn't mean that it's not been tested.
>
> I run here with updates-testing enabled, but often only report -karma
> when things break. There are just so many things in updates-testing,
> that I usually don't have time or energy to +1 all of them that work.
>    

I do the same.  One big issue with giving positive karma is that you 
probably aren't testing all use-cases for the software, so I'm hesitant 
to +1 just because it didn't explode.  It's important to know though 
that is *didn't* explode (which certainly would result in negative karma 
from any testers out there.  I still think there aren't enough testers, 
but neither should every tester give +1 to every package.

- Orion