Refining the update queues/process [Was: Worthless updates]

[Till Maas]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:42:57AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:

> > Are there even any  metrics about how many bad updates happened? For me
> > bug that can be fixed issuing an update are a lot more than regressions
> > with updates or new bugs introduced with updates. If updates are slowed
> > down, this will get even worse. Especially because the proposal is to
> > use time instead of test coverage as the criterion to push an update to
> > stable.
> 
> Actually the proposal is time AND test coverage.

I mind have misunderstood it, but afaics it only says that it will be
tested, because it spent time in updates-testing, but this is not even
true nowadays, even if packages stay long in updates-testing.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100303/5419dead/attachment.bin