Worthless updates

[Till Maas]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:45:02PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:37:14PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > actually works (i.e. if it doesn't lead to maintainers only caring about the 
> > conservative stream).
> 
> Packagers would then have the choice, I think this can only be a good
> thing. Right now they have the choice, but the user cannot know what
> the packager choosed. If somebody wants more stable updates or more 
> uptodate package than what the maintainer want, this could be a scenario 
> where co-maintaining is a good option with different co-maintainers caring 
> more about one or the other stream.

This came to my mind, too.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100303/f0e74c4f/attachment.bin