Provide more testing feedback (was: Re: Refining the update queues/process)

[Seth Vidal]

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:26:17AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:23:30AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great script here's a small set of changes to have easy-karma use yum as a module
>>>> instead of via subprocess.
>>>>
>>>> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/easy-karma-yum.patch
>>>
>>> There is now a git repo and your patch is included:
>>> http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=till/public_git/fedora-easy-karma.git;a=summary
>
>>   you got a set of things you want to work on there? If there's a TODO I'll
>> see if I can take care of some of them for you.
>
> Thanks, but for my personal use I do not miss anything currently, except
> that it could be faster. But this only hits me, because I am running it
> a lot to test it. But if you want, you can start creating a spec, so it
> can be packaged. Another obvious TODO is to get bodhi_update_str()
> included in the bodhi client in fedora-python.

Where is the module 'fedora_cert' packaged? I can't seem to find it.


> But I have a simple question, is this save to do?
> options.releasever = my.conf.yumvar["releasever"]

yes. it is. I actually just finished putting that in so RELEASE didn't 
need to be defined. :)

-sv