Fight bugs, not FESCo

[Till Maas]

On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 06/03/10 09:04, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:18:37PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:42:32AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> >>> Imho for the beginning, there is no need to be able to query complete
> >>> profiles, but it would be enough to have a count per package. A simple
> >>> implementation for this would be:
> >>>
> >>> 1) clients send a plaintext list of installed packages and a UUID every
> >>> X days or by user request
> >>> 2) file is stored in UUID.$timestamp (or it is stored as a BLOB in the
> >>> DB)
> >>> 3) once a day a crawler reads all files and counts for each package how
> >>> often they are installed,
> 
> What about uninstalled?
> 
> Update bring in upd to X, but package Y,Z. come in.
> User removes Y,Z without breaking anything.

I am not really sure what problem you are seeing. What is supposed to
break?

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100306/272768ad/attachment.bin