Another great update

[Thomas Janssen]

2010/3/7 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4 at gmail.com>:
> 2010/3/7 Thomas Janssen <thomasj at fedoraproject.org>:
>> 2010/3/7 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4 at gmail.com>:
>>> 2010/3/6 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>:
>>>> The numbers 11, 12 should only indicate the core
>>>> components revision number .
>>>
>>> I'm not convinced to this philosophy. I have used a few Linux distros
>>> in past 11 years, and this is something new to me...
>>>
>>> I hope that RHEL 6 will be released soon, Fedora 11 is going to be too
>>> bleeding edge for me ;)

That is you compare a few Linux distros with Fedora and "this" is
something new to you.
It's not for Fedora users. So the question is still alive:

Why are you trying to change the Face and Character of Fedora instead
of using what fits your needs (your own mentioned RHEL/CentOS)?

>> Well, sorry, but you clearly state that Fedora is something new to you
>> and you don't like the philosophy.
>
> No, I clearly state, that this "new way" described by Orcan is
> something new to me (and I not really convinced to this).

See above, and there is no new way yet. But people trying to make a
copy of Ubuntu or openSUSE out of Fedora.


>> So why don't you use something that
>> fits your needs like CentOS 5 as you mentioned RHEL 6 but rather try
>> to make something out of Fedora that Fedora isn't? Or become familiar
>> with what Fedora is and stands for.
>
> The same version numbers for stable version and previous stable
> version is not a Fedora way that I know. I used Fedora since FC5 and I
> wasn't aware about such plans.

Since you haven't noticed it in all that time, it looks like it can't
be that bad ;)

-- 
LG Thomas

Dubium sapientiae initium