Update question: some user data
psmith
psmith at fedoraproject.org
Sun Mar 7 16:02:31 UTC 2010
On 06/03/10 20:14, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 01:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> If that were the case, I'd have expected someone to bring it up in the
>> comments. No-one has.
>>
>> I've never actually heard of anyone running FN-1 because they want a
>> 'more stable' system; this thread was the first time I heard that
>> theory. In my experience, people run FN-1 because FN doesn't work for
>> some reason, or just because they installed it when it was FN and don't
>> want to take the time to upgrade...but that doesn't mean they want
>> 'conservative' updates, necessarily.
>>
>>
> A lot of users in our users list recommend and use a previous release
> because they want more a more robust system with conservative updates
> and do believe that using a older Fedora provides them with that since
> the important bugs would have been found and fixed already and that's
> one of the reasons I recommended that you subscribe to that list even if
> you aren't actively participating so that you get a better idea of our
> user base :-)
>
> Rahul
>
>
then i seriously think we are following different lists :/
as adam's poll is starting to show the majority of fedora users choose
fedora for the fact that it is leading the way with the newer software
and that it has constant updates. (ie
freedom,friends,*features*,/*first!*/) this argument that most fedora
users want a more stable system is not what the fedora users i came
across are after. tbh i think this whole identity crisis is blown of of
all proportion, you'd think that something like this would have come
with the fedora10 dbus probs or the 'stabilisation cannot be detected'
not now with a little kde popup window :0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100307/45d060e9/attachment.html
More information about the devel
mailing list