Proposed udpates policy change

[Josh Boyer]

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
>
>> I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path
>> policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still
>> allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable.
>
>That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the
>critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc.
>but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. I don't
>personally care if KDE is updated 20 times a week, or about other
>packages that aren't installed by default being rebased often.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100309/logs/critpath.txt

josh