QA's Package update policy proposal

[Kamil Paral]

----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> There actually already *is* a review point
> prior to moving to -updates, but it's currently owned by rel-eng and
> is
> not highly publicized, and very little gets rejected. It is there,
> though: rel-eng explained this earlier in the threads, and explained
> that they are unhappy with it being informal. I'm trying to find the
> post, but there's just too much to wade through, sorry :(

"Why Fedora needs an Updates Policy" from Josh Boyer:

  http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/36737.html

That's why we need some defined process. That's why we need
to improve current practice. That's why all those proposals
appear.