Adventurous yet Safety-Minded
al.dunsmuir at sympatico.ca
Wed Mar 10 12:52:27 UTC 2010
On Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:24:18 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 13:06, Steven I Usdansky
> Your proposal especially doesn't address the third point. How do
> effectively you rollback the package on the mirrors when you don't
> control them?
Assuming reversion to an older version of the package is not a
frequent event, having only the main repository house the necessary
delta files might work out well.
The additional network load for reversions should be containable at
the master. It has a number of advantages in that additional
information about package reversions can be collected:
- Basic statistics about the original and reverted package versions.
- Require that the user be prompted for a reason for the reversion, and
even more valuable information is collected.
More information about the devel