should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

[Adam Jackson]

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 11:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/10/2010 11:40 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote:
> > from my point of view, the vast majority of users uses man to show the
> > wanted man-page content (the reason to add the dependency).
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Actually, I am having problems to imagine any system without "man" 
> installed, esp. because SUSV/POSIX mandates man to be present.

You think Fedora has to be POSIX?  That's adorable.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100310/c74e9e7e/attachment.bin