Hard drive spec change
Ric Wheeler
rwheeler at redhat.com
Thu Mar 11 01:19:12 UTC 2010
On 03/10/2010 05:38 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 03/10/2010 05:28 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> On 2010/03/10 17:09 (GMT-0500) Ric Wheeler composed:
>>
>>
>>> Felix Miata wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> The change is for the benefit of manufacturers, not users. Readiness is only
>>>> spotty. The discussion has been extensive and ongoing on the linux-ide
>>>> mailing list.
>>>>
>>
>>> Users do benefit as well - more capacity per platter specifically is one
>>> obvious win.
>>>
>> Some users, yes, those with unfathomable storage capacity requirements,
>> saving every byte ever encountered without regard for its utility. For those
>> with more common needs, the compatibility cost outweighs the purported
>> benefits. Most users don't even need 1/10 of .2TiB, much less the 2TiB at
>> which larger than 512 byte sectors might start looking sane in cost/benefit
>> analysis.
>>
> Note also that the access time will be slightly faster.
>
>
And power consumption will go down as you won't need as many platters :-)
ric
More information about the devel
mailing list