Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Frank Murphy]

On 12/03/10 11:56, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Frank Murphy<frankly3d at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 12/03/10 11:33, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> -snipped--
>>
>> If I can be indulged.
>>
>>> it's because i can't believe that dial-up-land user are really that
>>> stubborn
>>
>> It's not the endusers fault,
>> they have bad infracture.
>
> Oh, so it's our fault?

It's just life, in all it's forms.

>
>> and use Fedora
>> Because that is what they want.
>
> I want a lot myself. Doesn't mean i can have everything. But i can
> choose, as can they.

They have, Fedora


>
>>   (and even worse try to change it)
>> They also want to learn,
>> maybe eventually be in a position
>> to give back to the Fedora Community,
>> and floss in general.
>
> They can give back with any other distro as well,

True.

that fits their needs better.

So you say.


>
>>   instead of
>>> using what fits their needs.
>>
>> Maybe Fedora is what fits their needs?
>
> Obviously not.

You can't make that call for them.

That is not, you are not intitled to voice your concerns,


>
>>> Next time i buy a car, i will buy one who gets upgrades on a regular
>>> base, but hard for me to get it in my country. I will then complain
>>> and cry until they start to support me well.
>>   Sure i could buy a
>>> different car that's older and needs just a bit oil from time to time,
>>> but hey, this is a free world, i can change anything.
>>>
>>
>> Apples and Oranges.
>
> Nope, just a perfect example not software related.
>
Except when you need to drive the Nullabor.
You wish you had the upgradeable car.


-- 
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora 12, 13, Rawhide: x86_64