Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at
Fri Mar 12 18:42:18 UTC 2010

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:48:23AM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 12.3.2010 02:26, Mike Chambers napsal(a):
> > On F13, upgrade gnome-panel to version in updates-testing and you'll get
> When was F13 released? Oh, it wasn't, so it is just glorified Rawhide 
> still? And you complain about it being broken (especially in its 
> updates-*testing*)?
> BTW, this is the reason why I disagree with the way how we did unfrozen 
> Rawhide. Instead of getting even more free version of Rawhide, we've got 
> one more make update and similar non-sense.
Hmmm... so are we or are we not claiming that the pre-release branch is
supposed to be a valid thing for people to be running if they want
a semi-rolling flavour of Fedora?  Note that I'm not claiming that you
personally are claiming that.  Just that I'd be willing to try running F+1
for a cycle or two if, in fact, it's expected to be the place our users who
want a semi-rolling experience are expected to go.

If it's "just a glorified Rawhide" then there's really no point in telling
people to run it... they'll just get disgusted with Fedora's stability and

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the devel mailing list