Stable Release Updates types proposal

[Al Dunsmuir]

Friday, March 12, 2010, 7:02:54 PM, Kevin wrote:

> Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> Maybe   part   of  the  answer  is  that  some  resources  (especially
>> automation)  need to be dedicated to keep the core critical components
>> of rawhide from being gratuitously broken and staying that way?

> An answer to what question? Certainly not to the points I made!

> The problem is not with gratuitous breakage, but with breakage inherent to a
> rolling branch such as Rawhide.

>         Kevin Kofler

And  turning  all  releases  into  rolling  branches helps keep things
sane?

Please call a spade a spade. Without a reduction in churn in the stable
releases that is what they become and remain until EOL - a rolling branch.