Conflicts in latest update

[Ankur Sinha]

On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:45 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Jon Masters wrote on 16.03.2010 13:04:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:16 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> >> Dne 16.3.2010 09:50, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
> >> > I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a package from rpmfusion would
> >> > conflict with one from fedora repos. (It's in rpmfusion for a reason)
> >> > Is it being obsoleted by a fedora package (license been cleared or
> >> > something)?
> >> 
> >> There are constantly modules moving between -good, -bad, -ugly packages 
> >> of gstreamer, and sometimes rpmfusion packages are not in sync with 
> >> Fedora ones. Give rpmfusion packagers some time to fix it (or join them 
> >> and help to fix it on your own).
> > 
> > I'd just add those gstreamer packages to my exclude config in yum for
> > the moment, if you don't want to deal with the breakage each time. Then
> > you can remove those excludes when the repos catch up with each other.
> > 
> > /etc/yum.conf:
> > 
> > exclude=gstreamer-plugins-bad-free gstreamer-plugins-good
> 
> There are so many developers around on this list that know: reporting
> bugs is the right way to get problems fixed and fixing things is way
> better than posting workarounds to public places for various reasons --
> nevertheless nobody filed a bug yet afaics  :-/
> 
> CU
> thl
> 
> P.S.: A updated gst-plugins-bad package that afaik solves the problem in
> question was pushed to the proper RPM Fusion repos one or two hours ago,
> so there is no need to report a bug anymore afaics -- but people will
> continue to see the problem for the next ~24 hours or so due to
> mirror-lag and caching issues

Hey,

I'm really grateful for the info. I didn't have enough knowledge on the
transitions going on wrt gst packages which is why I hadn't reported a
bug yet. The intention of the thread here was to get more info on what
was going on. 

-- 
regards,
Ankur 
- FAS : ankursinha ; franciscod @ Freenode
- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5E9BF638

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100316/331184cc/attachment.bin