Conflicts in latest update

[Ankur Sinha]

On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:46:16 -0400, James wrote:
> 
> >  Rpmfusion can run auto QA like tests on rpmfusion and Fedora (I don't
> > think we can legally do the same ... but I'm not sure). Finding the file
> > conflicts automatically is harder (you need to download all the rpms),
> > and it's not fast, but it's possible (Seth has a script, IIRC).
> 
> I've created and published a proof-of-concept script a couple of times
> before. It's the one I've used to file all those bugs about conflicts
> in Rawhide.
> http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/confcheck-remote-split2.py
> (that's a more experimental version that tries to work with just 1GB of RAM)
> It does not download all packages, but just the headers. For packages
> stored in a local mirror, the speed isn't too bad. It ran approx. 11 minutes
> with remote Rawhide, though, on an average dual core machine.
> 
> Will Woods/autoqa features a conflicts checker, too,
> https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-March/date.html
> which is why I haven't continued with filing further tickets or with
> enhancing my script.


hi,

Is there a wiki page with more info on this script please? How it's to
be used etc.?

-- 
regards,
Ankur 
- FAS : ankursinha ; franciscod @ Freenode
- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5E9BF638

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100317/ec493a0f/attachment.bin