Update testing policy: how to use Bodhi

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 00:11 +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 23:49, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> [... snip ...]
> > 1. I have tried this update in my regular day-to-day use and seen no
> > regressions.
> >
> > 2. I have tried this update in my regular day-to-day use and seen a
> > regression: bug #XXXXXX.
> >
> > 3. (Where the update claims to fix bug #XXXXXX) I have tried this update
> > and found that it does fix bug #XXXXXX.
> >
> > 4. (Where the update claims to fix bug #XXXXXX) I have tried this update
> > and found that it does not fix bug #XXXXXX.
> >
> > 5. I have performed the following planned testing on the update: (link
> > to test case / test plan) and it passes.
> >
> > 6. I have performed the following planned testing on the update: (link
> > to test case / test plan) and it fails: bug #XXXXXX.
> 
> This is basically what Doug had proposed, except that you added 5. and 6.

Great, glad to hear we're thinking in the same direction from different
angles :) Do you have a link to his proposal? I don't recall reading it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net