Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

Linuxguy123 linuxguy123 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 31 02:26:12 UTC 2010


On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:09 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle
> bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file
> an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If
> the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX.
> But
> if the bug has been reported upstream, the Fedora bug gets closed
> UPSTREAM. Ether way, the bug gets closed, no matter if it was actually
> fixed or not. 

+1 on this !  I thought it was just me.  I've given up on reporting bugs
largely because of this issue.



More information about the devel mailing list