Reasons for hall monitoring

[drago01]

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:45:53PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This thread  is now closed. We've received repeated complaints about the
>>>>> redundancy of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> No further posts to this thread will be allowed.
>>
>> I'm disappointed that the thread is closed when there seems to be an
>> issue that isn't resolved.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to try to focus the discussion rather than
>> ignore the issues?
>>
>> Call me cynical but I don't see how 'repeated complaints' is
>> justification to end a thread. Were there more people complaining than
>> those participating? It's very easy to ignore a thread if you think
>> it's unimportant.
>>
>
> Apparently, 3 user+2 moderator complaints [1] are enough to close a thread.
>
> This is quite ironic since the statistics of a poll of 180 real users
> were regarded insignificant and biased by the same people.

WTH?

Please read up what statistics even mean ... this has nothing do do
with statistics and polling.

But whatever...