Reasons for hall monitoring

drago01 drago01 at
Tue May 4 22:00:36 UTC 2010

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora at> wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 02:45:53PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>>>> This thread  is now closed. We've received repeated complaints about the
>>>>> redundancy of it.
>>>>> No further posts to this thread will be allowed.
>> I'm disappointed that the thread is closed when there seems to be an
>> issue that isn't resolved.
>> Wouldn't it be better to try to focus the discussion rather than
>> ignore the issues?
>> Call me cynical but I don't see how 'repeated complaints' is
>> justification to end a thread. Were there more people complaining than
>> those participating? It's very easy to ignore a thread if you think
>> it's unimportant.
> Apparently, 3 user+2 moderator complaints [1] are enough to close a thread.
> This is quite ironic since the statistics of a poll of 180 real users
> were regarded insignificant and biased by the same people.


Please read up what statistics even mean ... this has nothing do do
with statistics and polling.

But whatever...

More information about the devel mailing list