Reasons for hall monitoring
kzak at redhat.com
Thu May 6 22:26:03 UTC 2010
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> > Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a):
> > >> Thank you for pointing out yet another undemocratic policy passed by one of
> > >
> > > +1 The Hall Monitor Policy is cancer.
> > +1000 it feels to me like in a bad old Communism when the open debate
> > was allowed only when it didn't touch the leading role of the Communist
> > Party. I really don't think anybody in this thread said anything so
> > sacrilegious that the thread should be terminated.
> Normally, I'd be against it killing a thread, but the thread that
> started this discussion had already been done awhile back and this new
> thread added *nothing* new to the discussion. Frankly, it was more
This all is your subjective opinion. There is not objective and
unbiased way how evaluate any discussion, it's unmeasurable. That's
the reason why Hall Monitor Policy is nonsense.
Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com>
More information about the devel