Reasons for hall monitoring
matt at mattmccutchen.net
Fri May 7 21:54:01 UTC 2010
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 07:37 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> well there are a few potential solution to this:
> 1) try to get rid of this policy
> 2) use different lists/forums to continue the discussion.
> you pick which one is worth to go ahead with. this is not a democracy,
> and it has been stated often enough by all people involved, not even
> an indirect one.
Right. Someone in the community should set up a suitable list or forum,
identical in charter but with weaker restrictions on "unconstructive"
discussion. It could even be called Mail Fission. Volunteers? I could
do it if no one else wants to. Or does such a venue already exist?
We'll see how many people join. If very many people do, the board may
be persuaded to change the policy; if not, that would suggest that the
current policy is acceptable to the community at large.
More information about the devel