Reasons for hall monitoring
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon May 10 23:19:01 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 01:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > > achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
> > >
> > What makes you think that no community input is considered?
> Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
> >From whom it was gathered?
> What was the question?
> What was the answer?
> - Gilboa
Most likely by reading or participating in the various threads on
subjects that have happened on this list and the FAB list and the
desktop list and others. It seems to be a rather big assumption that
board decisions are made in a vacuum.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100510/f897d488/attachment.bin
More information about the devel