rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6 perl-Date-Simple.spec,1.13,1.14

[Paul Howarth]

On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Author: pghmcfc
>>
>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> 	perl-Date-Simple.spec
>> Log Message:
>> Minor clean-ups
>>
>>
>> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6/perl-Date-Simple.spec,v
>> retrieving revision 1.13
>> retrieving revision 1.14
>> diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
>> --- perl-Date-Simple.spec	26 Jul 2009 05:33:20 -0000	1.13
>> +++ perl-Date-Simple.spec	11 May 2010 14:21:45 -0000	1.14
>
>> -* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org>   - 3.03-2
>> +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org>   3.03-2
>>    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
>
> What are you trying to achieve?

Just making the changelog format consistent within the spec file.

> I am not aware of any rule mandating "<email>  version".
> Conversely, Fedora has been using<email>  - "version" for ages.
> cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

I know; the "-" is optional.

> That said, IMO, all your changes do is rendering diffs between different
> distros less readable.

True, at the expense of a slight readability improvement (IMHO) in the 
current spec. Shouldn't be a problem going forward though, and if I push 
an update for an older release, that'll get the same changes too, which 
will help with the diffs.

Paul.