paul at city-fan.org
Tue May 11 15:48:16 UTC 2010
On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Author: pghmcfc
>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>> Modified Files:
>> Log Message:
>> Minor clean-ups
>> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
>> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6/perl-Date-Simple.spec,v
>> retrieving revision 1.13
>> retrieving revision 1.14
>> diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
>> --- perl-Date-Simple.spec 26 Jul 2009 05:33:20 -0000 1.13
>> +++ perl-Date-Simple.spec 11 May 2010 14:21:45 -0000 1.14
>> -* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.03-2
>> +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> 3.03-2
>> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
> What are you trying to achieve?
Just making the changelog format consistent within the spec file.
> I am not aware of any rule mandating "<email> version".
> Conversely, Fedora has been using<email> - "version" for ages.
> cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
I know; the "-" is optional.
> That said, IMO, all your changes do is rendering diffs between different
> distros less readable.
True, at the expense of a slight readability improvement (IMHO) in the
current spec. Shouldn't be a problem going forward though, and if I push
an update for an older release, that'll get the same changes too, which
will help with the diffs.
More information about the devel