rc040203 at freenet.de
Tue May 11 15:58:36 UTC 2010
On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> Author: pghmcfc
>>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>> Modified Files:
>>> Log Message:
>>> Minor clean-ups
>>> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
>>> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6/perl-Date-Simple.spec,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.13
>>> retrieving revision 1.14
>>> diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
>>> --- perl-Date-Simple.spec 26 Jul 2009 05:33:20 -0000 1.13
>>> +++ perl-Date-Simple.spec 11 May 2010 14:21:45 -0000 1.14
>>> -* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release
>>> Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.03-2
>>> +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release
>>> Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> 3.03-2
>>> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
>> What are you trying to achieve?
> Just making the changelog format consistent within the spec file.
>> I am not aware of any rule mandating "<email> version".
>> Conversely, Fedora has been using<email> - "version" for ages.
>> cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
> I know; the "-" is optional.
>> That said, IMO, all your changes do is rendering diffs between different
>> distros less readable.
> True, at the expense of a slight readability improvement (IMHO) in the
> current spec.
Stylisic bikesheding, without benefits.
> Shouldn't be a problem going forward though, and if I push an update
> for an older release, that'll get the same changes too, which will
> help with the diffs.
Consider all my packages to be "off-limits"/"taboo" for you.
More information about the devel