rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6 perl-Date-Simple.spec,1.13,1.14

[Paul Howarth]

On 11/05/10 16:58, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>> Author: pghmcfc
>>>>
>>>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>>>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>>>
>>>> Modified Files:
>>>> perl-Date-Simple.spec
>>>> Log Message:
>>>> Minor clean-ups
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6/perl-Date-Simple.spec,v
>>>> retrieving revision 1.13
>>>> retrieving revision 1.14
>>>> diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
>>>> --- perl-Date-Simple.spec 26 Jul 2009 05:33:20 -0000 1.13
>>>> +++ perl-Date-Simple.spec 11 May 2010 14:21:45 -0000 1.14
>>>
>>>> -* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release
>>>> Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.03-2
>>>> +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release
>>>> Engineering<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> 3.03-2
>>>> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
>>>
>>> What are you trying to achieve?
>>
>> Just making the changelog format consistent within the spec file.
>>
>>> I am not aware of any rule mandating "<email> version".
>>> Conversely, Fedora has been using<email> - "version" for ages.
>>> cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
>>
>> I know; the "-" is optional.
>>
>>> That said, IMO, all your changes do is rendering diffs between different
>>> distros less readable.
>>
>> True, at the expense of a slight readability improvement (IMHO) in the
>> current spec.
> Stylisic bikesheding, without benefits.
>
>> Shouldn't be a problem going forward though, and if I push an update
>> for an older release, that'll get the same changes too, which will
>> help with the diffs.
> Consider all my packages to be "off-limits"/"taboo" for you.
>
> Ralf

Suit yourself, though I wouldn't dream of making cosmetic changes like 
those to other people's packages anyway.

Paul.