Provenpackager and Sponsor guidelines change
kevin at scrye.com
Wed May 12 16:04:52 UTC 2010
On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:57:34 -0500
Garrett Holmstrom <gholms at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 5/12/2010 0:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > - After a week, if more than 3 (three) sponsors provide positive
> > feedback, the candidate is approved.
> This disagrees with the ticket. Is it supposed to be "three" or
> "more than three?"
Sorry, thats my typo there. ;(
it should be "three".
I did update the wiki page correctly, but then didn't put the right
thing in the announcement. ;( Sorry about that.
> > - If the candidate has any negative or veto votes, then FESCo looks
> > at feedback at their next meeting and votes.
> Is there any difference between a "negative" vote and a "veto" vote?
> If there is a difference they could use clarification. If there
> isn't it might as well be trimmed down to just "negative" votes.
No, no difference.
I used only 'negative' on the wiki too. ;(
That will teach me to write up an email from memory after a long day.
Sorry for the trouble.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100512/20d80a30/attachment.bin
More information about the devel