Renaming packages, trimming changelog and re-starting revisions?
a.badger at gmail.com
Thu May 13 16:13:42 UTC 2010
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
> > (jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
> > trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that
> > point on wiki.
> > So:
> Personally, I'd say. . .think really old is around three-
> > 1. Is is required to trim the changelog when renaming package?
> Please don't, but do comment on the old name at the( relevant changelog
Agreed -- I do trim changelogs of really old entries from my specs (4+
years) once a year or so. That's separate from renaming.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100513/bf970e65/attachment.bin
More information about the devel