ImageMagick update

[Chen Lei]

2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <forum at hubbitus.com.ru>

>
> About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html
> So, upstream is not carefully there and I never can't guarantee what there
> no ABI breakage in any update...
>
> P.S. It seams it does not hit list, i post mail again. It is reason such
> big delay...
>
> --


Normally, if the update is a pure bugfix release,  it's safe to update and
don't need a rebuild, and you should update them on rawhide as well as
stable branches to fix bugs

If API/ABI is changed, only the following packages need a rebuild. Packages
depends on ImageMagick itself actually don't need a rebuild even the API is
changed.
repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
gdl-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64
pfstools-imgmagick-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64
drawtiming-0:0.7.1-1.1.fc14.x86_64
pfstools-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64
ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
k3d-0:0.8.0.1-1.fc14.x86_64
gdl-python-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-view-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64

BTW, some subpackages contain .la files, you should remove them in %install.
e.g.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1858222

Regards,
Chen Lei
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100517/05069889/attachment-0001.html