base kernel to build fedora

Adam Williamson awilliam at
Mon May 17 23:15:43 UTC 2010

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:41 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 11:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > otherwise it remains at B2.
> > 
> > Just because you manage to build a kernel, or even manage to boot a
> > kernel, doesn't mean it really works.  We really need all the testing
> > that goes into a full Fedora release before we trust what is built
> > from that, which is why my suggestion of building Fedora N+1 on Fedora N.

>   Yes of course = by "it succeeds" I meant passes regression tests etc.

We don't by any means have enough programmed testing to be confident
about this kind of status for more than milestone releases at present.
Given that, it certainly seems much safer to just build F(N+1) on F(N),
as proposed earlier.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org

More information about the devel mailing list