Mono.Cecil and monodevelop
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue May 18 20:26:32 UTC 2010
On 05/18/2010 03:56 PM, Paul wrote:
>> We could even package the older mono-cecil in a mono-cecil0690 package,
>> as a last resort, but we should definitely try porting the apps first.
> And to add further problems - guess what the version number is for
> mono-cecil bundled with MD? And they're not the same....
I'm going to guess that it is either undefined or less than the 0.6.90
version that the system mono.cecil has...
More information about the devel