Mono.Cecil and monodevelop
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue May 18 21:49:28 UTC 2010
On 05/18/2010 05:38 PM, Paul wrote:
>>> And to add further problems - guess what the version number is for
>>> mono-cecil bundled with MD? And they're not the same....
>> I'm going to guess that it is either undefined or less than the 0.6.90
>> version that the system mono.cecil has...
> Reports as 0.6.90 but a quick diff shows otherwise...
Awesome. Remind me again why mono is a good idea? :)
In all seriousness, is there any chance we can ask the mono.cecil
upstream to step in and put some stop to this?
More information about the devel