libjpeg for F14
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue May 25 16:05:22 UTC 2010
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:47:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > How about this: since libjpeg is picking momentum and there are
> > actually people updating the code base, why not push for a
> > libjpeg-turbo merge into the original ijg's code and get Fedora to
> > rebase on that unique source instead?
> The problem, as I said before, is that the libjpeg upstream is not
> being developed in an open manner.
Licensing is also an issue here. It's probably easier from licensing and
project management perspective to merge the ijg libjpeg into libjpeg-turbo
than vice versa.
> I've emailed Adam Tkac to bring his attention to this thread (he's
> involved with libjpeg-turbo) and hopefully he'll bring some more up to
> date information about this matter.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100525/5a33586e/attachment.bin
More information about the devel